I think our project and group two's project are the most relevant for the English department's web site. I don't mean to pick on group one: what they did was interesting and I liked the multi-media aspects, but I felt like it was just information. It didn't have a real direction. It was interesting information and I enjoyed reading through (particularly the timeline), but I guess I just don't see the strength of connection that I did with the other two projects. Or, perhaps I should just say that I felt ours was more along the same lines as Group Two. I think we were definitely aimed at the same audience: English students seeking information about their department. Multimedia aspects are similar: links to information. There wasn't anything over-the-top. I think all the groups focused more on function than on flash.
As far as other groups' input to our project, the consensus seemed to be that the slides were crowded. I'm not great with power point, so that could be true, but I tend to disagree. Maybe a couple of them could have been split up, but I would be less intimidated with more information on less slides than less information on more slides. That could just be me, though.
